Author Topic: BNP forced to accept non-white members  (Read 12345 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Diabolico

  • Neandertal
  • ***
  • Posts: 448
BNP forced to accept non-white members
« on: October 15, 2009, 07:17:26 AM »
Quote from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8308582.stm
BNP leader Nick Griffin has agreed to ask his party to amend its constitution so it does not discriminate on grounds of race or religion, a court heard.

The UK's equalities watchdog had argued the BNP broke the Race Relations Act by restricting members to "indigenous Caucasian" people.

The court heard Mr Griffin had agreed to use "all reasonable endeavours" to revise its constitution.

BNP members will be asked to agree to the changes at a meeting in November.

Mr Griffin was not at the hearing at Central London County Court on Thursday morning.

Quote from: http://itn.co.uk/880b3a63c7ae49252d7d200f2b5f554d.html
The British National Party has been forced to change its membership rules to allow people of different races and religions to join.

The far-right party agreed to change its constitution after the Equality and Human Rights Commission issued County Court proceedings over concerns its membership criteria were restrictive to those within certain ethnic groups.

Robin Allen QC, counsel for the Commission, said party leader Nick Griffin had agreed to present party members with a revised constitution at its general meeting next month.

He added that the party had agreed not to accept any new members until the new constitution was in place.

xD imagine when new policies are put in place, or when leader Nick Griffin comes out with some hate speech.
Quote from: Brian Moore
Despite the tons of examples and docs, mod_rewrite is voodoo. Damned cool voodoo, but still voodoo.

Offline laama

  • Homo Superior
  • ******
  • Posts: 2564
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2009, 12:43:16 PM »
They maybe forced to take Caucasian members but reality could be different.

And this is far from over.
i'm waiting for someone to start an antisocial networking site.


Offline Diabolico

  • Neandertal
  • ***
  • Posts: 448
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2009, 01:03:04 PM »
They maybe forced to take Caucasian members but reality could be different.

???

And this is far from over.


Yeah, the BNP are biding their time.
Quote from: Brian Moore
Despite the tons of examples and docs, mod_rewrite is voodoo. Damned cool voodoo, but still voodoo.

Offline chekovsulu

  • Human
  • *****
  • Posts: 1671
  • Gender: Male
  • With powers of hawk, wolf, puma and bear.
    • TITLE!
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2009, 01:16:54 PM »
I can't want to see the news coverage when the BNP has it's first black member!

Now Zoidberg is the popular one!

Offline smokester

  • Administrator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 15952
  • Gender: Male
  • Da mihi castitatem et continentiam, sed noli modo!
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2009, 01:22:44 PM »
I think they even disallowed Muslim members who of course could be white.

All that they have been asked to do is abide by the law, because that old Race relation act stipulates that you cannot not be a political party if you exempt people on account of colour, race or religion.
Don't put off until tomorrow, what you can put off until the day after.

There is an exception to every rule, apart from this one.

Offline laama

  • Homo Superior
  • ******
  • Posts: 2564
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2009, 01:52:27 PM »
???

Officially they might take members that they don't like,but trying to go their meetings etc. isn't very funny situation.
i'm waiting for someone to start an antisocial networking site.


Offline Geemonster

  • Banned for all eternity
  • Human
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Gender: Male
  • Diasfora's Misfit
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2009, 02:01:44 PM »
Actually there are already black and Asian members,the government didn't want you to know that.
  I've spoken to one of them 2 yrs ago.
Propaganda!

Offline chekovsulu

  • Human
  • *****
  • Posts: 1671
  • Gender: Male
  • With powers of hawk, wolf, puma and bear.
    • TITLE!
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2009, 02:06:35 PM »
If that is true, then I suppose by advertising this the BNP risks losing the NF votes :o

Now Zoidberg is the popular one!

Offline Geemonster

  • Banned for all eternity
  • Human
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Gender: Male
  • Diasfora's Misfit
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2009, 02:09:11 PM »
Everything in politics is misdirection mate.
We could run this country better than those wallies in parliament right now.

Offline Diabolico

  • Neandertal
  • ***
  • Posts: 448
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2009, 02:28:22 PM »
There is one thing that gets me, what's behind this? There are groups that allow specific ethnic groups, but seemly don't get challenged. This could get twisted.

I can't want to see the news coverage when the BNP has it's first black member!

Ditto and I want to see a group photograph including the new member.

Officially they might take members that they don't like,but trying to go their meetings etc. isn't very funny situation.

I think their constitution will be updated with something on the lines of disallowing people who they don't like or want to join. If the BNP made any non-white member (if that's the right way of putting it) fell unwelcome, some action would take place.

When I read your first reply a few times, one way I took it was if it was the other way around.

Actually there are already black and Asian members,the government didn't want you to know that.
  I've spoken to one of them 2 yrs ago.

Didn't know that.

Propaganda!

So? It isn't like the BNP are clean. The government wouldn't defend the BNP, the BNP haven't stated that. So the question is why hasn't that been stated?
Quote from: Brian Moore
Despite the tons of examples and docs, mod_rewrite is voodoo. Damned cool voodoo, but still voodoo.

Offline Geemonster

  • Banned for all eternity
  • Human
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Gender: Male
  • Diasfora's Misfit
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #10 on: October 15, 2009, 02:32:57 PM »
Im no politician mate,to be honest,the sooner im out of here the better.
  My business plan's being put into action starting Monday.

Offline laama

  • Homo Superior
  • ******
  • Posts: 2564
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #11 on: October 15, 2009, 03:36:54 PM »
We seen soon how things going and how much poo flies when it hits the fan.
i'm waiting for someone to start an antisocial networking site.


Offline smokester

  • Administrator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 15952
  • Gender: Male
  • Da mihi castitatem et continentiam, sed noli modo!
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #12 on: October 15, 2009, 04:12:46 PM »
To join any political party you must believe in their manifesto, which is a bit oxymoronic in this case as very few of the people involved with the BNP can actually read.  But it does mean that the members of society that they now have to grant membership, are exactly the same people that would oppose their manifesto wholeheartedly.
Don't put off until tomorrow, what you can put off until the day after.

There is an exception to every rule, apart from this one.

Offline Geemonster

  • Banned for all eternity
  • Human
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Gender: Male
  • Diasfora's Misfit
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #13 on: October 16, 2009, 05:39:43 AM »
I believe in proportional representation,or autonomy for each town county etc.

Offline Robin-Graves

  • Rev AJ's Grand Inquisitor
  • Homo Superior
  • *
  • Posts: 4278
  • Gender: Male
  • Power doesnt give you the right
Re: BNP forced to accept non-white members
« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2009, 07:56:19 AM »
Good luck on that happening bro

In the states,, several states have declared autonomy, and when they did, the Federal Govornment, squashed more rights we have in the Constitution.
God forbid anyone does anythng that we  have the rights to do.

What ever happenedto people just being allowed to live and be happy?
I guess the answer to that question is simple.
We created a monster to makedecisions for us, and look at where we are.
A monster is a monster, no matter what you call it.
I keep my standards low.
That way im never disapointed.