Author Topic: Happy Christmas  (Read 14446 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ohcheap1

  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 19082
  • Gender: Female
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2012, 04:57:42 PM »
This was my ring tone last Christmas. Ha! Hilarious clip and I really dont like that show. Well....... Im trying not too to spite my husband and daughter.

Offline smokester

  • Administrator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 15943
  • Gender: Male
  • Da mihi castitatem et continentiam, sed noli modo!
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #16 on: January 03, 2013, 06:16:08 AM »
Happy Birthday Christ

Best guess Christ was born sometime in July.
Don't put off until tomorrow, what you can put off until the day after.

There is an exception to every rule, apart from this one.

Offline dweez

  • Global Moderator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 11622
  • Gender: Male
  • Rebel Mod
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #17 on: January 03, 2013, 11:14:14 AM »
--dweez

Offline smokester

  • Administrator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 15943
  • Gender: Male
  • Da mihi castitatem et continentiam, sed noli modo!
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #18 on: January 03, 2013, 12:33:24 PM »
( ... I don't know about the other bloke)

He wasn't born in December that's for sure. And oddly, that isn't even secret nor disputed.
Don't put off until tomorrow, what you can put off until the day after.

There is an exception to every rule, apart from this one.

Offline smokester

  • Administrator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 15943
  • Gender: Male
  • Da mihi castitatem et continentiam, sed noli modo!
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #19 on: January 03, 2013, 01:47:30 PM »
i'm not sure that there even was a "December" a couple of thousand years ago, so it makes little difference.

The Queen has an official birthday which is not on the anniversary of her birth, so why shouldn't other folk?

All my friends who are "orthodox" something or other, rightly celebrate Christmas on the 7th of January on account of the missing 13 days.
Don't put off until tomorrow, what you can put off until the day after.

There is an exception to every rule, apart from this one.

Offline 6pairsofshoes

  • Homo Superior
  • ******
  • Posts: 3771
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #20 on: January 03, 2013, 07:57:19 PM »
I thought December was the tenth month of the Romulan calendar.

Offline goldshirt*9

  • Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 7390
  • Gender: Male
  • Who yous looking ats
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #21 on: January 04, 2013, 05:16:30 AM »
you mean there really was a Christ other than the one that appears here now and again

Offline dweez

  • Global Moderator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 11622
  • Gender: Male
  • Rebel Mod
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #22 on: January 04, 2013, 11:06:24 AM »
Actually, there is historical proof by secular historians proving the existence of a Jesus that lived at the time of the proposed biblical history.  As to whether he was what the Bible dictates, that's up to you and your faith.
--dweez

Offline goldshirt*9

  • Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 7390
  • Gender: Male
  • Who yous looking ats
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #23 on: January 04, 2013, 11:14:25 AM »
proof other than the bible.
interesting, post a link

Offline dweez

  • Global Moderator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 11622
  • Gender: Male
  • Rebel Mod
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #24 on: January 04, 2013, 11:58:09 AM »
--dweez

Offline dweez

  • Global Moderator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 11622
  • Gender: Male
  • Rebel Mod
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #25 on: January 04, 2013, 11:58:34 AM »
Also, IIRC, Jesus was a very common name back in those times.
--dweez

Offline goldshirt*9

  • Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 7390
  • Gender: Male
  • Who yous looking ats
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #26 on: January 04, 2013, 02:24:29 PM »
you would know more about thus subject than me  :)
wiki is so , hmmmm alterable though.

Offline dweez

  • Global Moderator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 11622
  • Gender: Male
  • Rebel Mod
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #27 on: January 04, 2013, 02:35:35 PM »
It is, but Josephus is a well-renowned historian from that time period.  I didn't want to divert the discussion (if you know what I mean), just wanted to point out that the existence of a person by the name of Jesus, who professed to be the Son of God, was well documented.  Also, whereas I don't particularly care for "Wikipedia as proof" either, that particular page is well-footnoted.
--dweez

Offline smokester

  • Administrator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 15943
  • Gender: Male
  • Da mihi castitatem et continentiam, sed noli modo!
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #28 on: January 04, 2013, 03:49:59 PM »
I don't think there's much doubt that Jesus (of Nazareth) existed, it's just that there is no reference in the bible or anywhere else that states when he was actually born.  I believe that it is celebrated on the 25th of December because of the existing Hanukkah festival, the midwinter Saturnalia and Dies Natalis Solis Invicti also around the same time, and possibly other bits and bobs to do with Mithras.
Don't put off until tomorrow, what you can put off until the day after.

There is an exception to every rule, apart from this one.

Offline dweez

  • Global Moderator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 11622
  • Gender: Male
  • Rebel Mod
Re: Happy Christmas
« Reply #29 on: January 04, 2013, 04:16:18 PM »
That sounds right to me.  I don't think anyone actually believes Jesus of Nazareth was actually born on December 25th (or the same correlating date back in biblical times).
--dweez