So I started watching House of the Dragon, which is not bad as a tv series, so far. Thought I'd catch up on the background, so I picked up Fire & Blood, the book on which it is supposedly based. This is the 2018 publication of Geo. RR Martin's back story to the House of Targaryen. Great googly moogly. Here is a book in desperate need of an editor.
Did he get paid by the word or what? And after god only knows how many pages (I read it in epub format), the story just kind of peters out. The long regency of one king ends and then, as an afterthought, he mentions that the king's reign didn't fare well, but then, THE END. Like, "I'm done with that 2000 pages." Ding! Time's up!
And, tacked on, "by the way, if they'd have let me write a longer book, here's the rest of the history of the House of Targaryen summarized in a list of Kings." The list is also kind of goofy, in that it ignores a major theme of the book he'd just finished, the usurpation of the crown by Aegon II, a reign that he treats as normal and regular, despite the naming of Viserys's daughter as the rightful heir. He mentions her parenthetically, as if he hadn't just spent hundreds of pages discussing the war that resulted from the illegal occupation of the throne by her half brother. Nor does the book complete the cycle. Why does he quit where he does? Who can say?
As ChrisT once said, Martin simply doesn't know how to end a book. We are still waiting for the end of the A Tale of Ice and Fire series, and, I find it telling that, instead of completing that cycle, we get this prequel that also has an unsatisfactory "ending." Has anyone else read this?