After a long time, I have decided to revisit the "Thomas Covenant" series, have never read the last series and have decided to start from the beginning. Wish me luck
Luck.
I read the first Chronicles, all the while not understanding or believing the motivation of "our hero" . I had no sympathy for him from the beginning, and even less as time went on. Once I got over this dislike, I enjoyed the story (although the rape still leaves a bad taste, even all these years later), and some of the world-building was brilliant (although depressing and derivative), but I hated the main protagonist. I thought that in general the story overcame his hero, and the ending tied everything up nicely.
Then the second Chronicles, and the new hero(ine) was as bad as the first and (although I didn't think it possible) this lot was much more depressing than the first lot. Donaldson's writing quirks were just as noticeable and consistent, but after a dodgy start I got into these books and quite enjoyed most of the read.
All around I don't think that Donaldson should be allowed to write heroes, as he hasn't a clue how to do them. I think that he is of the opinion that all heroes have feet of clay, if not feet, legs, torsos and necks of clay, and it is his job to show us that they aren't worth the paper they are printed on: except that he relies on them eventually coming good and saving everyone. (Unbelievably The Gap Cycle is even worse: his continual use of rape as a weapon - and as motivation/ justification in those books - is even worse than in the Covenant books, and just appalling, in my opinion)
After twenty years I picked up the first book of the last Chronicles and just couldn't get into it at all. Donaldson sets a very depressing scene quite believably, but I really couldn't force myself to spend any time in that bleak/ bleaker/ bleakest environment. The Last Chronicles are therefore sitting unread on the top of my wardrobe, and there they shall remain.
As I say, I wish you luck - let us know how you get on!