Author Topic: Movies the world didn't need.  (Read 48857 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline 8ullfrog

  • Homo Superior
  • ******
  • Posts: 3247
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #15 on: March 16, 2017, 06:57:32 AM »
Yeah, my tablet was giving me all sorts of poo trying to paste youtube links.


The first link is 19 seconds long, and is dean Winchester killing a vampire with a big knife. He says "eat it twilight".

The second is a mash up that mixes the douchebag from twilight being creepy, and buffy the vampire slayer being, well...

When he finally gets around to saying he wants to kill her, she turns it around and kills the poo out of him.

 There was actually a fairly big copyright snafu over the video where lions gate tried to jack the monetization of the video, and eventually lost.

Offline smokester

  • Administrator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 15943
  • Gender: Male
  • Da mihi castitatem et continentiam, sed noli modo!
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #16 on: March 19, 2017, 02:32:22 PM »
I really have to add The Games maker to this list.  Apart from the story being convoluted and ridiculous, it really had no purpose or point. I kept thinking that perhaps it was a good book that's narrative got lost in translation, but alas, there appears to be no book or even a Wikipedia page that might shed a little more light on it.
Don't put off until tomorrow, what you can put off until the day after.

There is an exception to every rule, apart from this one.

Offline brickbatz

  • Cro-Magnon
  • ****
  • Posts: 803
  • Gender: Male
  • Politically Incorrect
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2017, 06:51:51 PM »
99% of the people would probably disagree with me but IMO The Revenant (Leonardo DiCaprio) is just a remake of Man in the Wilderness with Richard Harris as lead. Already been done.


Online dweez

  • Global Moderator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 11622
  • Gender: Male
  • Rebel Mod
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2017, 06:57:59 PM »
Everything's already been done.
--dweez

Offline goldshirt*9

  • Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 7387
  • Gender: Male
  • Who yous looking ats
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #19 on: March 20, 2017, 08:47:57 AM »
99% of the people would probably disagree with me but IMO The Revenant (Leonardo DiCaprio) is just a remake of Man in the Wilderness with Richard Harris as lead. Already been done.
agree

Everything's already been done.

sometimes a lot better

Offline 8ullfrog

  • Homo Superior
  • ******
  • Posts: 3247
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #20 on: March 24, 2017, 01:00:25 PM »
Specifically, I meant this thread for movies that flat out shouldn't be made, because they took up time, money, and space from actual decent movies, or those weird mirror movies, like how armageddon and deep impact came out, or the two white house assault movies, or those shitty, shitty remakes.

The other day at goodwill I saw a metal dvd case, I picked it up, it said REARDEN STEEL.

The golly is rearden steel you ask? That shitty ayn rand "trilogy" that got one and a half movies.

Souless movies for rich naffs to masturbate to.

Offline 6pairsofshoes

  • Homo Superior
  • ******
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #21 on: March 24, 2017, 08:01:20 PM »
Thanks.  I'd never heard of it.  I imagine Paul Ryan and his besties having popcorn and beer over it.

Offline goldshirt*9

  • Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 7387
  • Gender: Male
  • Who yous looking ats
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #22 on: March 25, 2017, 04:26:15 AM »
silence - promised much delivered little

Offline Alfonz

  • Homo Erectus
  • **
  • Posts: 181
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #23 on: March 25, 2017, 12:26:49 PM »
Franchise sequels, the majority of which suck. Someone make a list  ;D

Offline goldshirt*9

  • Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 7387
  • Gender: Male
  • Who yous looking ats
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #24 on: May 02, 2017, 12:56:10 AM »
some of the Middle east war movies appearing atm on pay as you go streamng sites

Offline goldshirt*9

  • Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 7387
  • Gender: Male
  • Who yous looking ats
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #25 on: May 02, 2017, 12:46:22 PM »
Godfather 2
I didnt realise that number 2/3 were not written by Puzo, and the ending of number 1 in the book was a typical Hollywood happy ending.

Offline Alfonz

  • Homo Erectus
  • **
  • Posts: 181
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #26 on: May 03, 2017, 04:49:02 AM »
I didnt realise that number 2/3 were not written by Puzo, and the ending of number 1 in the book was a typical Hollywood happy ending.

Godfather Part 2 was a sequel and a prequel to The Godfather, so much of Puzo's story spans across the film. I would say that the Godfather part 2 is an exception to the "horrible franchise sequels", it was very well accepted in it's day as a great movie, but I suppose not everyone would enjoy it. Part 3 was indeed a poor film IMHO.

Offline smokester

  • Administrator
  • Q
  • *
  • Posts: 15943
  • Gender: Male
  • Da mihi castitatem et continentiam, sed noli modo!
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #27 on: May 09, 2017, 03:36:50 PM »
Everything starring Canoe Reeves.
Don't put off until tomorrow, what you can put off until the day after.

There is an exception to every rule, apart from this one.

Offline 6pairsofshoes

  • Homo Superior
  • ******
  • Posts: 3768
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #28 on: May 09, 2017, 09:48:45 PM »
Everything starring Canoe Reeves.

I quite liked "Speed."  I think it had a terrible sequel, but the first one was pretty exciting.

Offline Alfonz

  • Homo Erectus
  • **
  • Posts: 181
Re: Movies the world didn't need.
« Reply #29 on: May 10, 2017, 07:24:35 AM »
I also liked The Matrix, the sequels were pretty much as expected.  :(